What it was: Builders mixed crushed glass into stucco and terrazzo flooring to create glittery, durable surfaces.
Why it worked: Cheap, strong, and visually striking — it shimmered in sunlight and added texture.
Why it faded: Glass sorting declined when recycling systems changed; new builds prioritized speed and uniformity.
How it could return: Decorative aggregates for sustainable architecture — using local, post-consumer glass.
References:
National Terrazzo & Mosaic Association — History of Terrazzo: https://www.ntma.com/terrazzo-history/
Terrazzo & Marble Association of Canada: https://www.tmac.ca/terrazzo/
Wikipedia — Terrazzo: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrazzo
What it was: Ground-up tires (crumb rubber) added to asphalt to make quieter, longer-lasting roads.
Why it worked: Reduced road noise, improved flexibility, extended lifespan by up to 50%.
Why it faded: Cost of prep equipment and inconsistent tire collection programs.
How it could return: Cities reintroducing it now under “quiet pavement” and “rubberized asphalt” initiatives.
References:
U.S. Department of Transportation — Rubberized Asphalt Overview: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/recycling/
Rubber Manufacturers Association — Tire Recycling Facts: https://www.rma.org/ (redirects to USTMA)
Wikipedia — Rubberized Asphalt: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubberized_asphalt
What it was: Power plant waste (fly ash) used to replace cement in concrete.
Why it worked: Stronger, more durable, lower emissions.
Why it faded: Public misunderstanding around the word “ash” and industrial lobbying for traditional cement.
How it could return: Green concrete standards now reintroducing fly ash and similar industrial byproducts.
References:
Portland Cement Association — Fly Ash in Concrete: https://www.cement.org/cement-concrete-applications/paving/buildings-structures/fly-ash
USGS — Fly Ash Use & Production: https://www.usgs.gov/centers/national-minerals-information-center/fly-ash
Wikipedia — Fly Ash: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fly_ash
What it was: Shredded, treated newspaper packed into attics and walls as insulation.
Why it worked: Cheap, fire-resistant, energy-efficient.
Why it faded: Fiberglass became the norm due to aggressive marketing and convenience.
How it could return: Still used in sustainable retrofits — and could easily scale up again.
References:
U.S. Department of Energy — Cellulose Insulation: https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/weatherize/insulation/types-insulation
BuildingGreen — Cellulose Insulation Profile: https://www.buildinggreen.com/product-review/cellulose-insulation
Wikipedia — Cellulose Insulation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellulose_insulation
What it was: PET plastic from bottles spun into polyester fabric for clothing and carpets.
Why it worked: Diverted millions of tons from landfills; easy to process and dye.
Why it faded: Fast fashion co-opted it and cheapened the reputation of “recycled” textiles.
How it could return: Circular textile systems where old clothes feed new fiber production.
References:
Textile Exchange — Recycled Polyester Market Report: https://textileexchange.org/
Ellen MacArthur Foundation — Circular Textiles: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/
Wikipedia — Recycled Polyester: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyester#Recycled_polyester
What it was: Micro glass beads from recycled bottles used in road paint for reflectivity.
Why it worked: Improved night visibility and driver safety.
Why it faded: Still used today — but mostly from virgin glass beads due to processing costs.
How it could return: Municipalities switching back to post-consumer sources.
References:
3M — Glass Beads for Road Markings (industry standard): https://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/p/d/b40066463/
FHWA — Pavement Marking Materials: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/hlp/13078/
Wikipedia — Glass Bead (Reflective): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass_bead
What it was: Deconstructed barns, factories, and war ruins reused to build new homes.
Why it worked: Resource shortages demanded it — and the wood was already well-seasoned.
Why it faded: Mass-production of cheap, new lumber made reuse “unnecessary.”
How it could return: Deconstruction now replacing demolition in sustainable construction.
References:
Construction & Demolition Recycling Association — Wood Reuse: https://www.cdrecycling.org/
Forest Products Laboratory (USDA) — Reclaimed Wood Research: https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/
Wikipedia — Reclaimed Lumber: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reclaimed_lumber
What it was: Artists and cities reused industrial metal for sculpture, playgrounds, and monuments.
Why it worked: Durable, expressive, and full of character.
Why it faded: Safety codes and mass casting made custom reuse rarer.
How it could return: Urban beautification meets circular design — local scrap turned into civic pride.
References:
International Sculpture Center: https://www.sculpture.org/
Art Encyclopedia — Scrap Metal Sculpture Overview: https://www.visual-arts-cork.com/sculpture/scrap-metal.htm
Wikipedia — Junk Art: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junk_art
What it was: Old sidewalks, bridges, and buildings were crushed and reused in new roads, foundations, and retaining walls.
Why it worked: Saved landfill space, reduced the need for new stone, and provided a strong, stable base for construction.
Why it faded: Cheap access to virgin gravel and outdated building codes — often dismissed as “inferior” despite strong performance.
How it could return: Modern recycling tech now separates concrete, rebar, and contaminants efficiently, making it cleaner and stronger than ever — some cities are even mandating it.
References:
Recycled Materials Resource Center (RMRC): https://rmrc.wisc.edu/
U.S. DOT — Concrete Pavement Recycling: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/recycling/
Wikipedia — Recycled Concrete: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recycled_concrete
Waste isn’t waste — it’s misplaced potential
We didn’t stop reusing materials because they failed
We stopped because convenience won.
It’s time to fall in love with resourcefulness again!
Your donation helps us reduce waste, create community resources, build tools for educators, and expand accessible environmental education.
E-transfer a donation to:
donate@therecyclingproject.ca
Thank you for fueling a future with less waste and more creativity.
The Recycling Project is a social enterprise. Donations are not tax-deductible but directly fund community education and impact programs.